The city just keeps losing money – how do they do it?

Today (5/21/24) the city is having a special 1pm council meeting – one topic they will undoubtedly discuss is the $30 million+ drop in revenues compared to this time a year ago.

From KRCR News: “Sales tax revenues citywide are down eight percent, but for the Downtown North area, between First and Fifth streets, sales tax revenue is up 2.3 percent.”

Wow, THIRTY MILLION. Even with their one-cent sales tax, not to mention hundreds of millions in Camp Fire and COVID disaster relief money. They pissed that money away like a bunch of drunks with their dad’s credit card. Sometimes Sean Morgan even reminds me of Ed Helm.

You remember where that money went – yep, stuff like a skating rink, parklets for bars, plans for Downtown remodels – it’s just been a hayride for consultants these past five or six years. And the city claims sales tax revenues have actually been up for the Downtown sector. Wow, 2.3% – they’re bragging about that while the rest of town is down 8%?

Tom Van Overbeek, speaking on the local news, seemed to think it’s okay that while the rest of town is down, Downtown is on the up. He doesn’t mention how much money has been poured into that tiny grid, how many empty storefronts there are, and how many businesses are complaining about changes the city has made. City Plaza is (again) full of tents and trash, the streets are about to be torn out to accommodate a new sewer system, and more businesses are leaving. This man is in total denial.

“The recession has not materialized, people’s sense of anxiety about that has gone down They’re going out and buying drinks and going shopping,” said Chico council member Tom Van Overbeek. “There’ve been a number of initiatives to make the downtown cleaner, safer, and more interesting. We put up historical signs, we have police patrols now; Downtown Chico Business Association (DCBA) has been active in getting people downtown.”

But could Downtown pay for itself? Starting with a complete rehaul of the sewer system and then a new “streets plan”? Is Van Overbeek telling us Downtown generates enough sales tax to pay for that stuff? On restaurants, bars, and expensive crap shops?

Meanwhile, in the rest of town, I hear the usual complaints – mostly about the condition of the streets. Sure, potholes and fissures are bad for your tires and your car in general. They’re dangerous because people drive crazy to avoid them. Cycling around town also presents a lot of dangers that are not overcome by a white stripe painted along the side of the road. While the city is planning to spend millions on bike lanes Downtown, they seem to forget that people live elsewhere in town, on streets that are not conducive to cycling. I know a lot of people, like myself, that walk, drive, and cycle, and we’re not happy with the condition of the streets. That’s bad for business – it’s a lot easier to shop online, and plenty of nearby towns with nicer retail areas.

That brings us to the issue of pedestrian safety. In fact, the ADA, which requires sidewalks and street crossings suitable for people in wheelchairs, was passed in 1990 – 34 years ago. There are commercial and residential areas all over Chico that have no sidewalks, seriously damaged sidewalks, and damaged street crossings. Especially shocking to me are the TRIP HAZARDS, in the form of broken curbs, sink holes in the middle of crossings, and overgrown, unmaintained city street trees with roots that have lifted whole sections of sidewalks and streets.

Meanwhile, Downtown sidewalks have been redone twice in my recent memory, including the bulbing of the corners and the Studebaker strips.

Another huge problem all over town is lack of drainage – I’ve driven around town and seen entire blocks of both commercial and residential streets with not one drain. In my neighborhood that amounts to puddles the size of ponds that sit and stink for a week after a rainstorm. This forces pedestrians and bikes out in the street – thank you City of Chico. It also causes flooding and damage in yards. The people across the street from me all pay for flood insurance because the city has never placed drains along our street except in front of new subdivisions. When we were annexed over 20 years ago we were promised we’d get the full menu of city services, but all we’ve had so far are sewer hook-ups and the resulting shoddy patch jobs – future potholes.

So yeah, I’m angry about the work done on Humboldt and Stilson Canyon Road, and I’m wondering how many other questionable projects have been funded with Measure H while my neighborhood street – Old Chico! – voided the warranty on my new tire! “Excessive Road Hazard”!

I know others out there are similarly disgruntled, I hope they’ll write letters to the paper, I plan to.