At city meetings over the last few years, I have sat through one after another “power point presentation” regarding the city budget mess. It’s like a kindergarten-level slide show, designed more to distract and confuse than inform. They always turn the lights down to make you sleepy. It’s maddening to sit through this insulting and condescending babble – I don’t even want to think about the hours of my life these people have stolen, in addition to my tax dollars.
These stupid reports and “PPP’s” add up to hours of $taff time and related expenses – the computer programs to produce this junk, and the paper and ink to print it for a cavalcade of $taffers and council. They say it’s for us, for our information – hah! What they could have done in a page and a half report, in plain language, they turn into a marketing extravaganza, complete with graphs, charts, little cartoons – color glossy photos! I remember one whole page illustration, showing a sad, rather obese man, looking quizzically at his surroundings, tentatively holding out his umbrella to a darkening, sinister sky. At the bottom of the graphic, the caption read, “How did we get here?”
Oh here, let me field that question. As if it isn’t obvious – you people Downtown spend money like you were printing it in the basement, alongside all these glossy pamphlets and newsletters you hand around among yourselves. Not only do we have to pay your ridiculous salaries, we have to pay for something to keep you busy.
I got an interesting e-mail newsletter from Assemblyman Jim Nielsen, who was kind enough to address our Chico Taxpayer’s Association meeting a few months ago. He says, “Recent independent reports suggest that state government agencies and departments routinely spend on programs and projects with little accountability to taxpayers, failing to consider what is the most efficient and effective way to stretch tax dollars to the fullest. Eliminating waste, fraud and abuse in state government is essential to our efforts to solve California’s long-term budget problems once and for all.”
I think you could substitute “Chico” for “state”, and “California” throughout that passage. An example of a program on which the city of Chico routinely spends with little accountability to taxpayers is the Sustainability Task Force. Talk about your “color glossy photos” – get a load of this pamphlet recently produced by city $taff as a “Sustainability Indicators Report”:
http://www.chico.ca.us/government/minutes_agendas/documents/5-21-12STFAgendawreports.pdf
Yes, this is how they present a “report” to council – what the hell? I hate to see what they will do with anything REALLY important.
Hey, did you see the slick glossy pamphlet they produced to report about all the jobs they been bringing into town? TRICK QUESTION DAWG! You know they have not been bringing any jobs into town, look alive there!
This pamphlet mentions only two employers. They again mention Build.com, which has been here a few years now, as if they just got here and are hiring in droves. B.c claims to “support” over 400 people, but I’m not sure if that means employees, or includes whole families. Also, I don’t know where their employees came from – did they move here to take these jobs? Placing more strain on everything from housing to groceries to roads and schools? And I realized – Build.com competes directly with Lowe’s, Home Depot, and a half dozen or so other small, locally owned hardware stores and suppliers. Sure they can sell goods outside Chico, but they will sell them inside Chico too, taking business away from other employers. I wonder if city $taff takes this into consideration when they write these “reports.”
The only other business mentioned in the pamphlet is Springboard Biodiesel. The city apparently helped this developing company secure a $758,000 grant to start building it’s facility, but doesn’t say when they’ll start hiring people. I don’t know what “assisted in a grant submittal” means either – a lot of times, it means the city had to put up a certain amount of money to secure the grant. Nor any mention of who gave the grant – but I’ll guess, The Taxpayer! Thank Me Very Much!
The $taffer who produced this report makes over $100,000 a year in salary with a $50,000 benefits package. You got to keep a guy like that occupied.
At 5:30 this evening, Mayor Marie AnnShwabnette will be convening her court, the Sustainability Task Force, to give this “report” one last look-see before they present it to council on June 5. Frankly, I wouldn’t recommend these meetings – Schwab and her committees are what my friend Casey refers to as “time vampires” – they will steal your life with their incessant clatter, suck your brain drier than a biscotti, and leave you thinking you participated in something. Something.
You don’t have to attend these meetings to keep up on them. Send an e-mail to Linda Herman at lherman@ci.chico.ca.us and ask her to put you on the e-mail list, not only for the regular meetings but ALL the ad hoc committees. At least you’ll see the agendas – you will have to attend these ad hoc meetings if you want to know what’s really going on, and let me tell you, you’ll get an earful.
We will, by the way, be having a meeting of the Chico Taxpayers Association on Sunday June 3 – WE MAY DO IT EARLIER THIS TIME, I’LL KEEP YOU POSTED! Our agenda will be a discussion of the phone tax facts and also some background on the $255,000 hole in the city budget. Geez, let’s hope it doesn’t get any bigger before then!
POST-IT-NOTE: At 4:12, about an hour and 15 minutes before the meeting was to convene, I got a note from STF $taff liason Linda Herman. “After polling members, today’s the Sustainability Task Force meeting has been cancelled due to a lack of a quorum.”
Well, that’s the way to keep the public out of your meetings – have them at inconveniently inconsistent times, with little or no notice, and then cancel them at the last minute!
Letter: Who’s running this town?
Chico Enterprise-Record
Posted: 05/21/2012 12:28:18 AM PDT
Will someone, anyone, sitting on the Chico City Council, please tell me, and finally disclose to the public as well, just who on the council agreed to the union (every city-endorsed union) using collective bargaining demands, and by agreeing to do so, allowed these negotiations to be held behind close doors which led to a free for all on taxpayer-funded public funds?
What councilor will stand up and say, “We were just doing what every other town in the nation was doing. We never had a clue that the unions were really buying votes by keeping everyone hooked on their taxpayer money handout program.”
Come on folks, everyone with a brain knew the housing prices were overinflated, but hey, many got rich off the buying and selling homes as fast as they could bubble. Then truth rode into town.
Must we believe that not one educated person on that council knew that the union’s demands for salaries and pension payouts were overly excessive and unsustainable?
Was getting elected to council with union help really worth crashing the local government’s infrastructure and public trust? And you’re not wrong because it wasn’t your fault? Or, you really knew these contracts were wrong but you went along with the party line anyway, because after all, the cash to gain a vote program wouldn’t really be using your personal money.
Who’s in charge? The council, the unions, the taxpayer? Or does anyone on the council even know?
— Rick Clements, Paradise
Great letter – BOOM and BUST, in 250 words or less!