Ann Schwab and Kirk Trostle out to protect their own bottom lines – liquor ordinance just a revenue grab

25 Jul

In between gardening and putting up tomato sauce and peaches, I spent yesterday going back and forth to city meetings, a special Internal Affairs meeting at 8am and “economic development,” or at least, talking about it, at 4pm.

The Internal Affairs discussion was about what amounts to a money grab being attempted by Chico PD chief Kirk Trostle. Trostle, as you may recall from an earlier post,  was trying to get the ACE (Alcohol Compliance and Education) ordinance on an upcoming ballot, and told me at a Police Advisory Board meeting that he hoped it would result in at least $100,000 worth of (new) fees with which he could hire another officer. But, he admitted, the officer would not necessarily be dedicated to alcohol compliance or problems, he wouldn’t guarantee that.

Well, at a subsequent meeting, city attorney Lori Barker shot it down, informing Trostle that the “fee” amounted to a “tax”, and the city is not allowed to tax the sales of alcohol. So, Scott Gruendl moved for staff to work on an ordinance that would allow the city to collect some sort of fee without it being construed legally as a tax.  What a creep that guy is, a regular goniff.

Mary Goloff, Ann Schwab and Scott Gruendl are attempting to dress it up as the city’s plan to handle our “community alcohol problem.” Goloff and Gruendl are up for re-election, and Schwab is not only on the defense lately, she’s looking out for her interests at the college and her Downtown business.

Schwab has been hung out to dry, stripped of her former stately power. Lately she seems constantly to have been crying about something, and tears up at the slightest criticism or correction. She’s fallen back on her job at the college – an administrative fluff position that adds another $80,000 + in salary and benefits to tuition – and is desperate to show herself as champion for the college. She also needs to worry about her bike store – Downtown business is in trouble, and she has taken the tack of blaming the bars and other liquor-related establishments. She says “the university is doing what they can do.” Well, she sure knows who butters her bread.

She also made some questionable statements regarding liquor licenses, how they’re issued, and what happens when a business sells a liquor license. “Once a permit is issued,” she piped up, sounding like a character from “Th Music Man,” it’s ISSUED!” She went on to describe her nightmare scenario: a place could start out “respectable and low-key,” but that business might fail, and be sold to somebody else!  “It can change to PITCHER NIGHT  with no approval from council,” she concluded, setting her lips firmly and looking around the room for an “AMEN!

(…and that starts with ‘P’ and that rhymes with ‘T’ and that stands for TROUBLE! Right here in River City!)

Well, just like that pile of hooey she rolled out in support of Measure J, her statement above doesn’t turn out to be exactly true. Officer George Laver, who seems to be the guy in charge of liquor at the cop shop, informed all of us of the actual function of the state department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. It turns out that “conditions can be placed by the ABC – such as hours of sale of alcohol and other specifics…” And, even if the business comes under completely different ownership, the new owner cannot make “significant changes to the business model” without a hearing from the ABC that includes input from the cops and other local agencies.

In fact, Laver went on to describe a “very good working relationship with the ABC.” The ABC allows local agencies to have input and set conditions, and according to Laver, Chico PD and the city of Chico have been “very successful” in getting what they want out of the ABC.

Later, the owner of the Winchester Goose also corrected erroneous statements Ann made. First, he told everybody that the ABC has a very complete process for input,  everything needed to make a complaint or check on a business’s license is on their website.  Ann had also bitchily asked, in direct reference to the Winchester Goose,  “why would anybody put so much investment into a business without getting the liquor license first?” The guy from the Goose told his story – last November, he’d received “the green light” from Chief Trostle as well as the planning commission. It was only recently that they’d been talking about denying his license, after he’d already spent a bunch of money. Ann hates being corrected, she’s testy and combative with anybody who disagrees with or questions her. But she sure didn’t have anything to say in response.  As usual, her eyes turned red and got watery, she just sat there like a spoiled brat being called on the carpet. 

Everything Laver said confirmed that the ABC is competent and willing to work locally.  But, Chief Kirk Trostle seems to have a different view of the ABC, which he says, “is working with staff levels from the 1950’s…just pushing paper.” He says there are only two agents for 16 counties.

Well, I just dropped off a note to the Redding office, which Laver described as being so cooperative, and asked them about  that. I’ll keep you posted.

What both Schwab and Trostle want is more control than the ABC is willing to give them in making demands upon businesses that sell alcohol. According to Laver, a local land use permit process would allow the city “to create whatever kind of language you think is reasonable.

For example, the ABC says stop serving at 2am, Schwab and Trostle want it over at midnight. They want serving to stop at 10pm on certain holidays, historically troublesome dates like Halloween and St Paddy’s. Laver reported, in past, they’ve just asked the problem establishments, like Rileys, to stop opening up with cheap booze at 6am, and they’ve complied. But Trostle and Schwab just want to be able to demand. They don’t want to work it out, they don’t want to discuss.

I think they want to be able to demand more money out of businesses, using this ordinance as a wedge, but that’s just my guess.

There are two camps here that want this new permits process – those who are freaked out about Chico’s perceived reputation as a druggy town that kills college kids with booze, and then there’s Chief Trostle, who wants the money. This is a revenue grab, plain and simple, a shakedown. Ask the guy from The Screwed Goose.

Later yesterday I went to the Economic Development committee meeting, and that was a hoot too, I’ll fill you in later. Now I am off to get some pasta dough going, with which I am going to serve homemade tomato sauce with dinky meatballs.  Ciao Babeee!

3 Responses to “Ann Schwab and Kirk Trostle out to protect their own bottom lines – liquor ordinance just a revenue grab”

  1. Rick Clements July 25, 2013 at 7:55 pm #

    OK I HAVE to chime in on this one. First, Ann Schwab is planning to run for Third District Butte County Supervisor if Maureen decides not to seek re-election. That is a fact and all her moves publicly have to be calculated as such. She is desperately trying to disassociate herself as being one of the key figures that was responsible for depleting all the city’s emergency fund revenues, like, with all her Plastic bag ban meetings and her Sustainability Task Force meetings that worthlessly burned up over as hundreds of thousands of dollars in City staff time wages. In fact, this Progressive Liberal Jane Dolan wanna be has now appointed and engaged Jessica Allen, Measure A spokesperson, you know, the girl who refuses to get herself a day time job, she has since the Measure A election appointed herself as the savior of all righteous elections because she won one. And quite convincingly by beating up a senior citizen lady.Now Jessica is spreading the most bullshit lies a that a human can walk upon; to demean Brian Nakamura, the City Manager, by falsely accusing Brian as the cause of the city woes and budget deficits, just because Brian won’t give up part of his salary to solve the deficits THAT THEY AS GODS OF OUR CITY ARE DEMANDING!!!. Brian PAY YOUR FAIR SHARE these Democrat liars are demanding.

    This falls in line and compares to the Card Administration staff of Progressive Liberal Democrats who refuse to offer, or give up one red cent of their way overblown $100,000K+ salaries to save Caper acres. And with with this stupid demanding declaration from the Progressive Liberals folks I ask you this!. WHAT HAPPENED TO THE DEMOCRAT’S MANTRA during the last election; that rich folks (like the Card Administrative leaders) should PAY THEIR FAIR SHARE?????? You see people. When it comes to their monies, these greedy sons of bitches won’t offer a red cent of their own monies to solve a public need. Instead they’ll sequester our asses like Obama with tactical fears. So people; listen up; when you see Ann Schwab and Jessica Allen and the Card Staff blame the new City Manager for the city’s near bankruptcy conditions, remember this people; those who think like these two leaches and con artists they with their ignorance; they are enabling these two self serving maggots to con people yet another day. Vote Scott, Ann, and Mary off the Council. Then tell Jessica Allen to go get a job bitch and quit using the dumb ass students who think that “I’ll save the world now, all by myself, cause I’m in college” and that if JOBLESS JESSICA told me to vote the way she says ” then all us students, are NOT COOL

    Hell, Jessica, haven’t you figured out by now that you are just Ann and Kelly’s personal lap dog…and might i add… a dumb one at that!!! So lick this stamp Jessica and send yourself to a place you know very well. THE GARBAGE CAN.. Love you baby, and have your agent call my agent and let’s do lunch!! You buy baby girl!

    • Juanita Sumner July 26, 2013 at 5:08 am #

      I’m sorry, I also agree that Brian Nakamura needs to give back the $50,000 pay raise he took for himself and I want him to pay his full pension – not just his “share”.

      Why should CARD pay but not Nakamura and his staff? They should all pay, all of it. I’m tired of floating their party boat.

      That is quite interesting about Ann running for Mo’s seat – I been predicting this for years. That will be a neat trick, convincing the voters of Butte County that as mayor she had nothing to do with our city’s fiscal problems.

  2. Juanita Sumner July 30, 2013 at 5:31 am #

    Hah! Dave Little agrees with me, roll out the barrell!

    http://www.chicoer.com/editorials/ci_23757930/editorial-apply-alcohol-rules-uniformly

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: