Janus vs AFSCME: Reform California to hold workshop for public employees who want their union dues back

26 Dec

Earlier this year the Supreme Court ruled on a case brought about by a public employee who didn’t want to be a union member or pay union “fees“. In Janus vs the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), the court ruled, “Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable raises serious First Amendment concerns. That includes compelling individuals to subsidize the speech of other private speakers.”

In fact, non-members who have paid “fees” are eligible for rebates of at least some of their money – as much as 78% of member dues, for the privilege of having a job. According to Reform California, ” many of our friends, co-workers, neighbors, and family are eligible for an average rebate of $800 this year alone!”

The law supposedly restricted these “fees” from being used for political purposes, but given our own city clerk’s abysmal record of holding these PACs up to the rules, I’ll guess there’s never been any audit of how they are really collected or spent. Not in Chico, or Butte County, that’s for sure. 

Reform California and the California Policy Center are hosting a workshop to help non-union employees who have been ripped off for these “fees” to get their rebates. Get more information about that here:

https://reformcalifornia.org/event/briefing-helping-friends-get-their-union-dues-refunds/

 

Read more about the Supreme Court decision here:

Click to access 16-1466_2b3j.pdf

Reform California collected 200,000 signatures against “text tax” in 72 hours

21 Dec

I know people were mad about the “text tax” proposed by the California Public Utilities Commission to pay for “low-income” and transients to have free cell phones, but I’d long ago begun to believe the California Establishment doesn’t care what the taxpayers think. 

And then I checked my e-mail and found this from Carl Demaio, of Reform California.

Dated December 17, he says, “After an outpouring of public outrage, the crazy Text Tax proposal from Sacramento politicians has been withdrawn – for now…

A rare success for California taxpayers!

How did it happen? With YOUR support, Reform California mounted an immediate counter-campaign that included a digital ad buy, an online Stop the Text Tax petition that was signed by over 200,000 individuals in 72 hours, and aggressive outreach to the media to ensure they saw this bizarre proposal. You know an idea is extreme when even the liberal national media mocks it!”

Wow, 200,000 signatures in 72 hours!  Thanks Carl! I was afraid the defeat of Prop 6 would send Demaio back to his corner, but I see he’s come out swinging.

Carl Demaio is the man who almost single-handedly funded the “Yes on Prop 6” campaign, the measure that would have repealed SB1, a gas tax increase that was enacted last January by the state legislature. Demaio still believes, and I agree – Prop 6 suffered a narrow defeat largely because California Attorney General Xavier Becerra used misleading language in writing the ballot measure. State agencies like Cal Trans used taxpayer money to mount a misinformation campaign. Of course the media was no help, telling people the state would have no money for road work if Prop 6 passed. It was a marvel of propaganda.

Demaio warns us, “Because the Text Tax was only tabled for now, please continue to forward the “Stop The Text Tax” Petition to your friends: here’s the link.

I signed it, I’ll ask you to sign it too. Here’s a good reason – despite the threats to cut off road maintenance if we passed Prop 6, crying they have no funding, directly after the election, on November 18, the Legislative Analyst’s Office announced California will have a “significant surplus” of $15 billion by June 30, 2020. Right now there’s about a $9 billion surplus. That’s BILLION, Honey.

While I haven’t heard any plans to remount a gas tax repeal for 2020, I do expect to hear more taxpayer outrage at the polls in two years. 

Oh, by the way, if you want to join French, Portuguese, Spanish, and other patriots in tax protest, get your yellow vest! Over 4500 people have been arrested in protests in those countries, I’ll ask, what the fuck is wrong with Californians? Too much ganja? 

Harbor Freight Tools in North Chico has good yellow vests for under $5 – I love that, make a bold statement for less than five bucks. And be safer on your bike! 

https://www.harborfreight.com/catalogsearch/result/index/?dir=asc&order=EAScore%2Cf%2CEAFeatured+Weight%2Cf%2CSale+Rank%2Cf&q=yellow+safety+vest

Harbor Freight is located at 130 W. East Avenue, Suite A, across the road from Raleys. If you sign up for their catalog you get coupons in every issue – for Christmas we got a 20 percent off coupon.

Like Carl Demaio says, “While we celebrate, we know it is only a matter of time before they cook up another crazy and extreme tax hike — and we’ll be ready to fight it with your help!”

 

Text tax dropped – what will they try next?

17 Dec

Wow, it was good to see people get their panties in a  rumple over the “text tax” – upset the lobster pot a little.

Meanwhile, according to Rueters, “protesters angry over gas taxes and the high cost of living have been blocking roads across France, impeding access to fuel depots, shopping malls and some airports.” People have been killed, I don’t know how many. An organizer complained on Deutsch Welle News that the government is leaving Parisiens like her with less money to spend, small businesses are failing as a result of both high gas prices and low sales. The French economy, she concluded, is tanking because of over taxation.  

Welcome to California. The California Public Utilities Commission, saying they want to use the money to support “low-income” programs, tried to tack another tax onto our cell service, wiggle it in among the stack of “fees” already listed in the fine print on the back of our bill. Thank goodness for the Federal Communications Commission, although, I don’t understand the ruling, I’ll take it. I don’t think they should be able to tax us by way of our utility bills, but I’m not running the circus.

And what a circus it is! Our taxes already provide transients with free cell phones, give me another straw for my camel’s back why don’t you? 

How soon we forget – I almost have. In 2012, the city of Chico tried to get the voters to approve a tax they’d been collecting illegally, a cell phone tax. Even after the tax had been declared illegal by way of a lawsuit in the 1990’s, cities all over California were still collecting it, the same man had to sue each city individually, including Chico, to make them stop collecting it. Instead of stopping collection, and refunding the money to users as is the law, current city councilor and former mayor Ann Schwab wrote a measure for the 2012 ballot to trick voters into making it legal. 

When friends and I approached voters at venues like the Chico Farmer’s Market, we were shocked to see how shocked people were about this tax – they’d never looked very closely at their bills. And you had to look very closely. So they couldn’t believe the city was actually taxing their cell phone usage, on a percentage of the total bill. They got mad pretty fast. The measure failed. The city had to give refunds. 

That scam and this recent ploy by the CPUC to tack another tax onto our phone bills reminds me – they know what’s legal and illegal, and they don’t care. They will try anything to get more revenues. Right now the city of Chico and CARD are using taxpayer money to hire consultants who conduct “surveys” and write leading ballot measures to try and trick the voters into raising their own taxes. Don’t fall for it. And write your letters to the editor now, tell them you’re not falling for it. Maybe we can save them (ourselves) the cost of another ballot measure.

 

CARD still after their revenue measure – another consultant?

10 Dec

Today someone from the California Park and Recreation Society read several posts I’ve written here about Chico Area Recreation District’s attempt to pass a revenue measure. I followed them back to their site and they seem to be an legislative advocacy group, but I smell bond consultant.

http://www.cprs.org/p/cm/ld/fid=1

CARD has spent at least $100,000 in the last few years, on one consultant after another, trying get the public to support a revenue measure. The consultants all say the same thing.  Like the consultant that spoke at a recent city of Chico Finance Committee meeting regarding the sales tax/bond measure the city is pursuing – they need to find out what people want, and then promise it to them if they’ll only vote for the revenue measure. But the surveys are always leading – they suggest things like sports stadiums, grandiose aquatic centers.  The guy at the finance committee used an ice skating rink as an example. 

They all talk about demographics – statistical data relating to the population and particular groups within it.  Yes, they study the local voting rolls, neighborhood trends, who lives where and how they vote. And then they target those people in phone surveys. This was all explained by Bay Area consultant Ruth Bernstein at a CARD meeting I attended in 2016. 

https://chicotaxpayers.com/2016/12/20/card-plans-phone-survey-for-late-january-to-promote-new-funding-measure/

 “We know demographics.”  she said. She talked about picking and choosing who got called, using the voter roles. At one point a board member asked her if the survey would be conducted when the students were in town. She answered, “we’re not going to have a big  student turnout in 2018, so why include them in the survey?” So, she gets to decide who gets included in the survey. 

The whole thing is so deceptive – Bernstein also noted that people are generally distrustful of phone surveys, especially if they are done by out-of-towners. She complained that a lot of people use caller ID now, and won’t answer an area code they don’t recognize, so her company uses a mechanism that presents the caller-id with the local area code. 

Bernstein only surveyed 400 people, all handpicked – does that really represent our town? 

Another thing every consultant says is that it’s tough to pass these measures if there’s any opposition.   So part of their job is to snoop out the opposition. I think I felt a cold nose at my rear end today. 

 

 

 

 

City Public Works Director admits leaf pick up program is a subsidy for landscape contractors

7 Dec

On Thursday, Nov. 29, my husband and I were out in South Chico, shopping locally!  As the weatherman had predicted at least a week in advance, it had been dumping rain all day.

We get whopping storms here – everything from sudden and quickly over gully washers to three day dumpers. I’ll never forget a week of rain, in June of one year, when we watched a giant tree in our neighbor’s yard lean slowly over for days and finally come to rest on the roof of our garage.

And here’s another thing – a few months of Summer, and people seem to forget all about rain. 

For example, our city staff routinely gets caught with their pants down, as if they didn’t watch the news or what? I guess our public works director was on another two weeks paid vacation in Italy? All the expensive street sweeping and drain cleaning equipment the city has accumulated ($$$] and they let streets flood every year. On Thursday I couldn’t believe what I saw – busy streets with a foot or more of water, cars skidding and colliding, roads closing down, right at 2 – 3 o’clock in the afternoon.

It took us an hour and a half to get from our house in midtown to Home Depot and back.

I know, there are a lot more people in town these days. But the problem wasn’t the traffic. It was the leaf pick up program. Not only does the city NOT keep the streets swept of street tree debris, they allow commercial landscapers to dump leaves and debris from their customer’s yards at various “dump sites” around town.

When I reported seeing landscapers dumping piles of tree debris on Mariposa Avenue one afternoon,  I reported it to public works director Erik Gustafson.  According to the city website, only leaves from street trees are supposed to be piled in the street. It specifically states, no commercial landscapers. There is supposed to be a foot clearance for the gutters and drains. No branches or grass cuttings.

What I saw was a sprawling pile of mess, leaves that didn’t match street trees, shrubbery, and large branches, sprawled not only over the gutter but across the sidewalk. Loose leaves covered the street, making a slippery surface.

Gustafson replied,  “I understand the issue and what appears to be a subsidy for landscape contractors [his suggestion, not mine]…the intent of allowing landscapers to dump leaf material at several designated locations was to limit the amount of material in other areas with narrow streets. Prior to the commercial sites, there were many ares around the city where vehicles could barely pass due to the amount of leaf pile build-up.”

So, the city’s answer to illegal dumping by contractors is to give them their own free dump sites, out on the public street? I watched a landscaper do the same thing on Vallombrosa two days ago, a whole trailer full of yard waste from a gated subdivision.

Of course Gustafson knows the law. “Our preference is to have landscape contractors take their material directly to the compost facility and not dump in the street at all…”  Your preference? It’s the law, Mr. Six Figure Salary!

Don’t you just want to put your foot in a public worker’s package sometimes?

Oh but he’s working on it. “In fact, we’ve started to eliminate the commercials [sic]  dump sites and are down to five from ten.””

The leaf pick up program needs to end. Instead, they should have public works crews around town, cleaning gutters and drains days ahead of every storm.

Hey Erik, ever had your soft little hands on the business end of a rake or shovel? Don’t want to mess up your expensive slacks or those nice Italian shoes? We have to many stuffed suits Downtown.

As my husband and I wound our way by one wreck after another, we watched city workers, including the big drain sucker truck ($$$)  moving in to clear accumulated leaf piles out of the gutter in front of the entrance to Cal Park, leaves that had been dumped there by commercial landscape crews. We watch them all the time, blowing leaves out of business parks, as well as private residences, into the street, ignoring the rules about leaving a foot of clearance for water drainage, piling them out into the street, where they blow all over the place waiting for infrequent sweepers from the city. Thursday I  couldn’t help noticing  piles of leaves flopped right on top of drains, on streets all over my neighborhood.

Since I contacted Gustafson the leaf pickup press release on the city website has been changed to acknowledge the commercial dump sites. The website also says streets will only be swept every two weeks.

The leaf pick up subsidy needs to end.

Corruption also takes all the fun out of Democracy

27 Nov

Here’s another article regarding legislation shielding PG&E from liability when they cause a wildfire:

https://calmatters.org/articles/newsletters/wm-11-26-2018/

After reading about PG&E’s blatant tampering with the legislature, I had to write a letter to the editor. 

While it has not been proven PG&E caused the Camp Fire, victims are rushing forward to sue the utility giant for the loss of their homes. Meanwhile, a Southern California Legislator seeks legislation that would “help PG&E Corp absorb liabilities from this year’s fatal wildfires in California…”

Assemblyman Chris Holden (Pasadena)  also carried legislation in 2017 that allowed PG&E to sell bonds, backed by ratepayers, to cover their liabilities in the Santa Rosa and other deadly fires. That’s what I would call a “double burn.”

According to Insurance Journal, “Holden’s bill may serve as a framework for lawmakers to consider relief for PG&E from the billions of dollars it faces in potential liability for death and property damage in Northern California’s Camp Fire, the deadliest in state history.”

Holden “is concerned about the instability of the utility and the adverse effect it could have on ratepayers…” More likely he is concerned about the effect it is already having on PG&E shareholders – PG&E shares “plunged by more than half since the Camp Fire broke out…” 

Holden’s 2017 campaign reports show $8800 from PG&E, another $8800 from Edison. Cal Matters reports PG&E spent $6.28 million lobbying the governor, legislators and the California Public Utilities Commission, just in the third quarter of 2018. 

Holden’s new bill will come up in early 2019, needing a 2/3’s majority to pass. Contact your state legislators and tell them, this bill would rip the victims off twice. If PG&E caused these fires, their shareholders need to feel the heat.

 

 

 

 

Assemblyman to introduce legislation to let PG&E off the hook for the Camp Fire – they’ve already been allowed to pass the Santa Rosa fires off onto the ratepayers

24 Nov

 

With Christmas right around the corner, I’d like to start a new tradition: The Scrooge Awards

Let me make a few nominations, you send yours, we’ll have a cup of cheer and vote the winner on Christmas Eve. 

Candidate Number One: PG&E – I think you know why.

Candidate Number Two: Assemblyman Chris Holden (D, AD 41, northern San Gabriel Valley)

Maybe these two should be co-candidates, they’re thick as thieves. Holden is introducing a bill to let PG&E off the hook for wildfires they cause. I wish I could send them all a card – “Well Merry Christmas to you too, Assholes!”

From Insurance Journal:

https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/west/2018/11/20/509841.htm

“A bill that would help PG&E Corp. absorb liabilities from this year’s fatal wildfires in California is being drafted at the request of a state assemblyman who helped shepherd earlier legislation on the issue.”

Assemblyman Chris Holden is carrying this bill because, according to his staffer, “He is concerned about the instability of the utility and the adverse effect it could have on ratepayers and the ability to deliver services at a reasonable cost…” 

I don’t believe he’s worried about the ratepayers, I think he’s more worried about the effect it would have on PG&E shareholders.

“News of the bill sent PG&E shares up as much as 5.8 percent in after-hours trading. The stock has plunged by more than half since the Camp Fire broke out on Nov. 8.”

I know people here are mad, screaming for lawsuits, some already filed, but this piece of legislation could allow PG&E to pass their liability on to the taxpayers/ratepayers. That’s all of us, including the direct victims of the fire. 

“Holden’s bill may serve as a framework for lawmakers to consider relief for PG&E from the billions of dollars it faces in potential liability for death and property damage in Northern California’s Camp Fire, the deadliest in state history.”

They’ve already got away with passing the fines for the Santa Rosa fires on to the ratepayers. 

“In response to deadly fires in 2017, lawmakers approved a legislative package that allows PG&E to sell bonds backed by customers [ratepayers] to cover liabilities.”

We need to pay attention, write our state lawmakers, write letters to the editor, tell friends to do same. This legislation should be sneaking around in early 2019, and needs a two/thirds vote to pass. If they think we’re not paying attention they’ll do the bidding of their benefactors at PG&E.

Here’s another article from the San Jose Mercury News:

https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/11/20/pge-friendly-wildfire-bill-being-eyed-by-state-lawmakers-in-wake-of-lethal-butte-county-inferno/

 

 

Election 2018 took all the fun out of Democracy

6 Nov

Google reminds me this morning, “Go Vote!”

Go stuff a sock in your ass, Google! I voted two weeks ago, where have you been? 

But County Clerk Candy Grubbs says less than half the ballots she sent out have come back in. Wonder why? Cause people are disgusted and confused, is why. Just yesterday I talked to two elder Democrats who are not supporting Newsome, Denny or Feinstein, but can’t stomach their opponents either, so will not be voting in those races. These are people who have voted the Demo ticket since before I was born, and they say they’re just disgusted with the way this election has played out. They told me they are still out on many of the ballot measures too. 

They’re not alone.  Recently I talked to a young couple who say they are confused by many of the ballot measures and will probably not vote on any of them. I asked them to reconsider Prop 6, telling them if they read the description of the measure completely through they will be able to make a better decision. I don’t like to tell people how to vote, I try to tell them to educate themselves, but this election has been a textbook example of misleading and manipulating language and misinformation. 

And the press has been playing dirty too. I found a Yes on 6 letter in a Fairfield paper that had been titled “No on 6”. I wrote a note to the editor but have not received any answer. When I looked at comments below the letter I saw others who were asking why the title didn’t match the letter, but there it stands today, “No on 6”. 

https://www.dailyrepublic.com/all-dr-news/opinion/letters-editor/letter-to-the-editor-stop-waste-by-sending-message-no-on-6/

At the Chico Enterprise Record, it’s a pretty clear case of advertising. While editor David Little finally endorsed Prop 6, he’s been running a really obnoxious “No on 6” drop down ad for weeks. 

I don’t know if I should tell this story, I have enough trouble getting the ER to run my letters, hate to piss them off further, but I’m kind of pissed off about being held off by the forehead. I started writing Prop 6 letters early, and I sent my last letter BEFORE Dick Little announced the deadline. He held my letter for over a week, then announced the deadline, and ran my letter AFTER the deadline.

When I called him on that, he told me I could have one more election related letter, “but not about Proposition 6, because then Vercruyssen will call foul and insist on another one as well. I don’t want to go down that road. “

And then I had a note from a friend who had sent in a Yes on 6 letter and hadn’t seen it for a couple of weeks. I asked Little about it – he’d been on vacation (?!),  hadn’t seen it. 

I’ll tell you what happened – it was “lost” while Little was on vacation, and Schlobover and Urpseny were running the paper. My friend had to resend, and I told him to be sure and cc Little. And there it was!

So, what I’m hearing is, there’s a split on the ER editorial board, and when the editor is away, his underlings do whatever they want – mainly pander to their advertisers. That’s journalism! 

This is the worst election I can remember, as far as deceptive advertising and terrible press coverage. I’m just holding on for tomorrow, when I can scrape the last crap mailers out of my mailbox and stuff them in my garbage can. 

 

 

Enloe Hospital tells patients, get better insurance, or hit the road

4 Nov

Strange but true. Enloe CEO Mike Wiltermood makes over $1,000,000 in salary and benefits. What’s his job, anyway? Well, apparently, he’s GOD.  He certainly seems to have power over life and death, deciding who will receive life-giving treatment and who won’t, based on their income. That’s what he’s doing when he tells us Enloe won’t accept patients with Anthem Blue Cross – one of the cheapest plans you can find out there. He’s not just  throwing out an insurance company, he’s throwing out patients who can’t afford Enloe’s new rates. 

To see how Enloe’s rates compare to other hospitals, see this link. Ask yourself – how do they maintain “non-profit” status with that kind of mark-up?

http://www.hospitalcostcompare.com/hospitals/50039/inpatient

Read the ER story below:

By  | lurseny@chicoer.com | Chico Enterprise-Record

PUBLISHED:  | UPDATED: 

CHICO — Enloe Medical Center and medical insurance provider Anthem Blue Cross were not able to negotiate new contracts as of Nov. 1.That means residents who have commercial coverage are impacted, but not those with MediCal or MediCare coverage. Emergency room coverage is intact as well. Physicians within the insurance network will be impacted as well.For those patients with Anthem Blue Cross insurance, they may face higher costs for services or need to find medical care at a different facility out of town. It all depends on what kind of policy they carry, according to Enloe CEO Mike Wiltermood. Enloe is now out of the network, he said.

Wiltermood said Enloe started negotiating with Anthem Blue Cross in May, hopeful that a better contract could be reached. He said Enloe believes that physicians here weren’t being paid on parity with others.

“Anthem hasn’t given a contract increase in nine of the last 12 years” to physicians, he said Friday.

Wiltermood said Anthem wasn’t interested in offering a different contract, either not showing up prepared to negotiate or offering the same contract as has been in place for a number of years.

Wiltermood said Anthem “ … was telling enrollees that they were negotiating in earnest. That wasn’t the case.”

“It was basically take it or leave it,” Wiltermood said.

He said the last time the two sides met, Oct. 30, Anthem offered “less than the current contract.”

Enloe also received a letter from CalPERS, encouraging the hospital to find common ground for a new contract. Wiltermood said the letter was “bullying.”

Wiltermood said he wondered if CalPERS sent Anthem the same letter.

While a comment from Anthem indicated the insurer would be happy to bring Enloe back into the network, Wiltermood said there were so many occasions to do that that didn’t happen.

“We’ve been told that Anthem is not going to budge off the original agreement.”

Wiltermood acknowledged the situation can hurt Enloe in the short term.

“We’ll have to see if people migrate to other commercial plans. In the short run, there will be an impact and we understand that. A lot of this just depends on how people react. If it’s important (to them) to stay local, they’ll go to another insurance plan.”

Wiltermood said he had talks with Butte County school districts and others that could deal directly with Enloe, and would entertain other groups that might be interested in that.

Finally, enrollees can find a toll-free phone number on the back of their medical cards, and can call with their questions.

Anthem representative Eric Lail sent this statement to the Enterprise-Record:

“Our priority during these ongoing negotiations with Enloe Medical Center continues to be protecting affordability for our consumers, while providing access to quality healthcare. We are negotiating in good faith to bring Enloe back into our network of care providers as soon as possible. In the meantime, consumers can access care at one of the many providers in the area who remain in our broad network.

“We do believe hospitals and doctors should be compensated fairly, and that has been reflected in our offers to Enloe. However, we cannot agree to rates that are not in line with what similar providers in the area receive. Those higher costs would be paid for by our consumers, many of whom are covered by self-funded plans and pay for their medical services directly.”

According to Enloe, “Anthem Blue Cross has indicated that many of its members may be able to continue their pre-authorized care plan at Enloe if they have pre-authorized surgeries or other procedures, if they are scheduled before the termination date and within 180 days after the contract terminates.

Anthem Blue Cross has said its members may also be eligible to continue their care or complete covered services for an acute condition, terminal illness, serious chronic condition, care of a child (age 0-36 months) or pregnancy, Enloe indicated.

Chico Area Rec Dist wants you to forgive $180,000 loan to the nature center so they can use the money to pay their pensions – NO!

28 Oct

In a time when families all over California are cutting back their budgets and lowering their expectations for their children’s futures, public agencies continue to spend money they don’t have and expect the over burdened taxpayers to pick up the tab.

Chico Area Recreation District, for example, tells us they don’t have enough money to properly run programs they’ve run for years. They’ve dropped the Fourth of July pancake breakfast, closed a popular swimming pool, and cut back hundreds of part time employees to 28 hours or less to avoid the healthcare mandate,  complaining they don’t have enough money. But at the same time, they spent over a $1,000,000 buying a rotten old building in Cal Park, then spent 10’s of thousands more in repairs. Meanwhile they took over the Nature Center, $200,000+ in debt to the taxpayers, and  made plans for a grandiose recreation center miles out of town.

They continue to spend 10’s of thousands a year on consultants to help them get a revenue measure on the ballot.

And NOW they want the city of Chico to forgive half the debt for the Nature Center.

According to CARD’s budget, the Nature Center brought in about $250,000 last year, an increase over the previous year of $20,000. Why can’t they pay their debts?

 Most  CARD programs do not support themselves, taxpayers already subsidizing over half their expenses. Here’s a program that actually generates money, but instead of applying the proceeds toward CCNC expenses, they put the money in the general fund and use it to pay their $1.7 million pension deficit, generated years before they began managing CCNC.

That’s stealing, if you ask me.

Save your own money from being spent on more studies and consultants –  contact Ann Willmann and the board now, at annw@chicorec.com.   Tell them Willmann needs to pay more than 2% of her pension out of her $100,000+ salary, and they need to put CCNC proceeds in a separate fund until the ENTIRE loan is paid at the originally agreed terms.

From Chico Enterprise Record:

 | UPDATED: 
CHICO — There is only the matter of money standing in the way of the Chico Creek Nature Center coming fully under the Chico Area coffers of Recreation and Park District.

 

But it’s a six-digit amount.

At Thursday’s CARD meeting, the board agreed that taking over the Nature Center is a good move for CARD. The Nature Center’s board of directors approved dissolving the 501(c)3 under which it operates.

While the Nature Center program is a nonprofit, it has leased its center in Bidwell Park from the city.

“There is no problem with the Nature Center coming to us,” said CARD Director Bob Malowney, who serves on CARD’s Financial Committee and said the committee is happy with the idea too.

“We would like the city to meet midway on the outstanding balance, or better,” said Malowney.

There is the matter of a loan the city made to the Nature Center to help build classrooms while it was independent of CARD which the center’s board has been working to pay off in tiny chunks.

The original loan of about $185,000 had grown to more than $200,000 with unpaid interest after the Nature Center struggled over payments. Repeatedly, the center asked the city and was granted deferral of the loan payments and term changes.

According to a CARD staff report presented Thursday, there is a balance of $171,200 to the Nature Center loan from the city.

The Nature Center board has been working with the city to figure out how to proceed.

CARD General Manager Ann Willmann suggested to the board that CARD work with the city and offer to pay a portion of the outstanding loan. She did not indicate an amount or percentage.

Thursday, the CARD board agreed with Willmann’s suggestion, but was hoping for a small repayment amount, citing the numerous benefits the city has enjoyed since CARD began managing the Nature Center. and taking on its employees.

The Nature Center  would continue to operate as the Bidwell Park Information Center and would be a benefit to the city, Willmann pointed out.

CARD Director Michael Worley suggested the city could provide CARD more access to the immediate area around the Nature Center, such as Cedar Grove or the deer pen.

Willmann will be getting in touch with the city for further discussions.

Feasibility study

The CARD board accepted the final draft of the feasibility study and needs an assessment it ordered in regards to EveryBody Healthy Body.

The study indicated that more rectangular fields, such as soccer fields, are required; that more land is needed; that the build-out of DeGarmo Community Park cannot fulfill the community’s recreational needs.

EveryBody Healthy Body coordinator Jovanni Triceri told the CARD board that the organization “is hoping to find out ways to collaborate (with CARD) in the coming months.”

“We don’t think CARD should do all of this,” he said in regards to the feasibility study conclusions, adding that his nonprofit wants to make sure the CARD master plan is implemented.

“Our needs are beyond the building out of DeGarmo,” said CARD’s Malowney. “We’re looking forward for any group coming forward …”

A nonprofit, EveryBody Healthy Body has been looking at several hundred acres south of Chico for a sports and recreation complex to be built out over the next 50 years.