-
1.the quality of behaving or speaking in such a way as to avoid causing offense or revealing private information.“she knew she could rely on his discretion”
synonyms: circumspection, carefulness, caution, wariness, chariness,guardedness; More -
2.the freedom to decide what should be done in a particular situation.“it is up to local authorities to use their discretion in setting the charges”
synonyms: choice, option, preference, disposition, volition; More Today I attended an Internal Affairs Committee meeting. I know, I’m uncouth. To my own credit, I’ll say, I have quit cussing, out loud, and I’ve been trying to pay extra attention to my hygiene. I don’t eat anything explosive before a meeting, ever since I had a very unpleasant experience with a batch of brussel sprouts. But, I’m not going to sit there with a cork in it when the city tries to pull some stunt, and I ain’t going out of my way to be polite about it.
The city was aiming to charge property owners for expenses occurred by police, fire department, ambulance, and hospitals when police are called to a party with underage alcohol consumption. “Property owners” should mean parents, obviously, since it’s been noted in past discussions that a significant portion of the city’s underage drinking is occurring in private homes, the party hosted by a teen or just-turned-21 year old host, with or without the knowledge of the parents. Sometimes the booze is brought in, other times, Mom and Dad are out and the liquor cabinet is unlocked. And, I’ll say, I’ve actually had the parent of one of my kid’s friends ask me at a family Christmas party if it would be okay for my 13 year old to have some rum and coke punch mixed up by her 16 year old daughter. I quietly but firmly said no, and the other parents acted as though I’d farted out loud. So, I know, parents are a part of this problem. But, the ordinance specifically named “landlords.” Parents were never a part of today’s discussion.
It’s all about getting more revenues for the police department. This has been a focus of Kurt Trostle since he came into the Chief’s position. Sure, the police department spends a lot of money on drunken behavior in general. They arrest people all the time, including for underage drinking, but these people are not charged or convicted, so they can’t be made to pay any of the cost of the salaries or benefits involved. This, I have been told, is because our county DA won’t prosecute unless there’s a death – he says he doesn’t have enough staff. I’ll also say, I’ll bet it’s just too hard to prove who gave them the booze, who was the host, who was responsible for the underage person being there. Kids won’t rat. So, the police department literally spends millions, and asks for budget appropriations constantly, on Friday/Saturday night shenanigans with no recompense from the actual shenaniganers.
Months back a consultant was hired by some local agency to come in and describe the various methods of dealing with problems related to over consumption of alcohol, including but not limited to serving alcohol to minors. One topic he discussed was the social host ordinance. He described an ordinance in which landlords would be held responsible for incidents occurring on their property, with or without their consent or knowledge. He described it as a tool, not to control underage drinking, but to recoup response costs. He said, the main advantage to this type of ordinance was, it eliminates the due process for landlords. See, you have to give the drunken rioters due process – that’s what Ramsey doesn’t have staff for. But this ordinance these dirty sneaks were trying to foist would have given the police the “discretion” to decide when a response fee should be assessed, to whom it should be assessed, and how much the assessment would be. And, the money would go to the police department and any other agencies involved. Meaning, the landlord would get the Emergency Room and ambulance bill for the underage drinker, in addition to charges for salaries and benefits of police and fire department employees involved.
Now, I realize – if the landlord lives in the rental, buys the underage drinker the booze, watches while they drink themselves sick – sure, that person is responsible. I wanted them to say, in so many legal words, that they would eliminate all the instances of “landlord” in the ordinance, and replace them with “responsible party,” which would of course have to be determined in a court of law.
At this point, I will repeat, were trying to foist. The new draft gave four different options for this ordinance, the first being, no landlord responsibility. Legal staffer Roger Wilson explained that after a meeting with “stakeholders” (I wasn’t invited, even though I’ve been talking to Wilson about this ordinance), he decided that was what he would recommend. The other three options were completely ridiculous, and I can’t help believing they were put in as a threat if we landlords didn’t go along with this ordinance as a whole. Tami Ritter a couple of times tried to get speakers to say they’d support the ordinance if the landlord clause was removed. The committee finally voted unanimously to forward a recommendation of no landlord responsibility.
That was only part of the ordinance. The meeting ran so long – several people fell to complaining about how police have handled them or their tenants, including myself, the conversation went off track sometimes. See, it’s this whole notion of “police discretion.” That scares the hell out of me, that a cop is allowed to decide to, as Officer Lori MacPhail said at the meeting, “take somebody’s liberty.” And, she was wearing a piece – I’ll add, “take somebody’s life.” As we have seen in this town a number of times.
See, they don’t use the best discretion, none of these dummies. As I sat waiting for the meeting to start, I was unable to avoid overhearing a conversation between Tami Ritter and Lori MacPhail. Ritter was telling MacPhail that her mother had been sick last night. She said, in a room full of people, that her mother had got food poisoning from some chicken she’d bought at a local grocery chain. She named the store, one of our largest employers as well as sales tax contributors, by name. But, did she take her mother to the doctor? How does she know it’s food poisoning? How did she know it was the chicken? I think that’s really indiscreet Honey. She just took a shit on the reputation of this well-known chain, saying they sell bad chicken without providing any substantiation of the claim. How many people walked out of there thinking that was true, and will never buy meat at that chain again, and will tell their family and friends? That’s really poor judgement for an officer of the public trust. But both Ritter and MacPhail repeatedly claimed they have good discretion.
A matter of discretion
12 FebFrom Marysville for Reasonable Water Rates: We are NOT going away. We want change.
10 Febhttps://www.facebook.com/pages/Marysville-For-Reasonable-Water-Rates/176321489194208
“Whiskey is for drinking; Water is for fighting over” ~
This quote has been attributed to
Mark Twain
We have a lot of new information to share. Please share this post on your facebook site and with friends and family.
Several weeks ago a group of us from Marysville met with other cities to form a coalition. We have said many times that there is power and strength in numbers. All of us have been fighting alone. So forming an alliance, only makes sense. The group represents cities served by one of the BIG 3 private for-profit water companies in California: Golden State; Cal American; and California Water Service. Everyone has the same stories and issues: escalating water rates!! The coalition advocates for fair and reasonable water rates.
It is pretty obvious that we will never change the way that the BIG 3 do business. But we can lobby for change at CPUC. We can and will put pressure on local and state elected officials. CPUC appears to be rife with conflict of interest between its role as a State agency that oversees the private utility companies and its role as a rate setter for private utilities. The current system is broken!! It is working for the private water companies, but NOT for the ratepayers. There is no protection for the ratepayers of the private water companies.
The coalition of cities is growing. A website that will be representative of all cities that join the coalition will soon be up and running. We will keep you posted.
Yesterday several members of the coalition attended an Assembly Committee meeting on Utilities and Commerce in Sacramento. The topic of the meeting was “Keeping Water Rates Affordable”. Denise Rushing (Supervisor in Lucerne) gave a presentation about their issues with rates (Cal Water). Kudos to Supervisor Rushing for standing up and speaking out for those who elected her. Bill Simmons (Marysville) and Craig Bach (Lucerne) also spoke. They talked about escalating water rates; affordability; WRAM surcharges etc. Apparently Arizona does not have the issue that we have. The PUC in Arizona elects their commissioners. They are not appointed. They are accountable to the people. Wouldn’t that be wonderful?
Thank you to Bill Simmons and Craig Bach for speaking out. We appreciate you!!!
Chris Pedigo is scheduled to be interviewed by Channel 13-Sacramento this evening. He will address all of the issues above. Thank you Councilman Pedigo!!
Please be sure to share this update. It is encouraging to see how many cities are happy to jump on board with the coalition. We will continue to meet; to network; to lobby and share resources.
We will be back soon with another update. There is much more going on.
Spring and summer is just around the corner. More brown lawns. More brown parks. Higher WRAM charges. Higher water charges!!
We are NOT going away. We want change.
NOTE: Check out the new website
Michael Jones: Police union plays hardball
7 FebYes, we just watched Chico City Council approve police employee contracts that allow for salaries three to four times the median Chico income and only demand employees pay nine percent of their total pension cost, and then saw Scott Gruendl turn around within two weeks and make a speech about how much financial trouble our city is in.
Yes, the cops own Gruendl, and his friends Sorensen and Morgan, donating thousands of dollars to those three campaigns in every election, and/or spending as much on their endorsement. See for yourself, at Michael Jone’s blog, Chico Politics.
http://chicopolitics.com/?p=513
Here Jones has documented the inappropriate relationship between certain councilors and the police department. They get their talking heads elected, and they enjoy salaries in excess of towns in Marin and Napa counties where the median income is twice as much as Chico’s.
I know, friends of mine are incensed over Randall Stone’s outing of police officer Todd Boothe’s Facebook antics. What ever happened to the investigation we were promised? It got swept under the rug just like we said it would. Durfee wants Stone off the Police Advisory Board and out of any decisions involving the police department? Oh, come on. If that’s the case, then Sean Morgan needs to take the same door – he told me in an e-mail that he is very close friends with Peter Durfee, has known him since going to school with him here in Chico, and makes frequent ride-alongs with Durfee in his patrol car, at all hours of the night. When I asked Morgan if he could attend an August Sunday morning CTA meeting, he answered,
“I’ll chose a Sunday and come on down. I’ll give you a heads up. Won’t be this Sunday as I’ll be out with your favorite police officer until 4:00 AM.”
If they want Stone out, then Morgan goes too.
Thanks Michael Jones and friends for going to a lot of trouble, a lot of research, and then putting it up in an easy-to-read format.
Let’s hear more about separating the state
6 FebI’d like to thank a couple of people who have brought the State of Jefferson issue into our speaker series, and I was impressed with Bob Evan’s response when questioned about the subject.
Evans noted that we don’t get equal representation in Sacramento. Some serious talk about separation at county boards and city councils around the North State might get their attention, he opined. And, “If they just laugh at us, we’ll already be down that road...” – meaning, we’ll already have the legal process in motion.
This is a sentiment that always attracts my attention – getting their attention, whether they are Downtown or in O-ville or in Sac-o-tomatoes. I have given up on Washington DC, sorry.
I was about to give up on Sacramento when I had a curious experience. I told you all there was a hearing in Sacramento the other day, regarding water rates. The Committee on Utilities and Commerce was hearing from some sub-committees and other entities regarding the effects of private water company rate increases on low-income and the elderly. I had been told they were looking for public comment, but I knew I would not be able to go to Sacramento on a couple day’s notice, so I picked up my cell phone Monday morning and went about trying to contact the committee by phone.
I must have got a hold of a phone number the public is not supposed to have. It reminded me of the time I wandered out of my sister’s dressing room at JC Penny, and got lost in that catacomb of curtains. As I bashed in on all these ladies, strapped into their 1960’s style foundation garments, I was treated like something the cat dragged in – one woman hit me right in the face with her nylon. They didn’t give me a chance to say, “I can’t find my Gramma!” They just yelled at me and threw me out.
That’s what I encountered when I dared to dial a number at the Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce – “what are you doing here?” The woman who answered wasn’t a helpful public servant, she was a dog in the manger. Or, excuse me, a hog in the trough.
You know that story – a dog, who can’t eat hay, jumps into a manger and snarls at any cow that tries to eat. Dog knows he can’t eat hay, and hogs know they can’t eat all the slops. Dumb dog/hog? No, greedy dog/hog, a dog/hog that knows the power of running the manger/trough. Here we have the State Worker. State workers have a code – they protect the system, period. They are trough hogs, and they’re scarier than any dog you will encounter.
I tried to stay on track with this gal, I identified myself, and told her I was looking for information about a committee hearing that was to take place later in the day. She cut me off before I could finish what I was saying – “there’s no committee hearing today!” I kept trying to explain myself, and she just kept saying that. At some point I must have mentioned a name or a phrase she recognized because she suddenly started listening to me. She admitted there was a hearing. “I’ll transfer you...” and she sent me on to somebody else. Again, I was treated as though I had wandered in on a fat lady struggling into a girdle. The second woman denied there was a meeting, and asked pointedly what I was doing calling her. Again I struggled to explain, again I must have mentioned some kind of code words – she also admitted there was a hearing later that day, and transferred me to a third person.
So far, I had two women who had at first denied there was any meeting, but when I’d mentioned some specific names, they’d suddenly remembered – “oh – THAT meeting!” By the time I got to the third woman, I was pretty diddled, stuttering, but I persevered. She was ready to admit there was some kind of meeting that day, what did I want? I named the committee and meeting, and told her I had only heard about the meeting days before, on accident, and that I would not be able to attend. How could I make comments?
As if she hadn’t heard a word I said, she told me I could come to the hearing.
So, I responded again that I would not be able to attend, and I tried to chatter out my comments as casually as possible while I still had her ear. I told her my community was being hit with onerous water rate increases for pensions, and we were tired of putting up with inaction from the California Public Utilities Commission. She just kept babbling at me that I would have to come to the hearing. I told her I was sorry I had wasted her time and mine, said goodbye, and hung up.
Then I wrote an e-mail to the staffer who administers the committee. They’d gotten a hold of her when they’d contacted Assemblyman Anthony Rendon’s office, he’s on one of the sub-committees. I wrote in my e-mail various concerns we have here in Chico over our water rates – complaints from both the city of Chico and Chico Area Recreation District that trees would be dying all over town, ball fields would be going brown, and playgrounds turned to dust and mud. I also made a brief complaint about what happened when I tried to contact the committee by phone.
I got the usual glad-handers – the damage control artists. Wow, this lady is mad, and she has a big mouth – we better smooth her over! Now all the sudden, everybody wants to be all nicey-nicey! From Sue Kateley, staffer to the Committee on Utilities and Commerce:
Dear Ms. Sumner,
First, I’m very sorry to hear that your call was not handled properly. I want to assure you that it is not typical to hear that someone was treated badly by Legislative staff. If you could provide the phone number that you called, I will see if I can find out what happened that led to this situation.
The hearing was held yesterday afternoon and we had a number of Cal Water customers from Lucerne and Marysville who did attend. There is a video recording available over the internet if you would like to watch the hearing (I know that isn’t the same as being there). I think this link will work for you:
http://calchannel.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=7&clip_id=1784
We did hear a number of comments similar to yours, expressing concerns regarding steep rate increases proposed for Cal Water customers and a proposal that is being made by Assembly Member Yamada to provide assistance to low-income and disadvantaged water utility customers.
The Cal Water rate case has not yet been completed and some changes have been made to reduce the amount of the rate increase. I don’t know specifically what is currently being proposed for customers in the Chico area.
If you wouldn’t mind, could I put you in touch with the staff at the Public Utilities Commission so that you could get an update on the status of the rate proposal? I can do this via email but I don’t want to share your email without your permission. Let me know.
Best,
Sue
Sue Kateley, Chief Consultant
California State Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce
Yeah, yeah, yeah. They always want a name and a phone number. I don’t know how to tell this gal – it was her phone number, and she may be one of the trough hogs that snarled at me!
But, there’s good news up there. “The Cal Water rate case has not yet been completed and some changes have been made to reduce the amount of the rate increase.”
We still have time to contact these people. I’ll get back to this gal and ask her to put me in touch with the CPUC, and ask her for other contact information. I’ll try to be nice. But, I’m with Bob Evans. These snarling trough protectors in Sacramento don’t take us seriously. It’s time to sharpen that ax.
Please write letters to Anthony Rendon – we are conserving, but we’re still getting squeezed by Cal Water
1 Feb
I was happy to find, when I removed the freeze cloth, my nopal cacti had grown alot. The little one at right front was a leaf that fell off. I threw it in the compost pile, and about two months later, I realized it was growing, so brought it back. The big mother plant is there in the left foreground, the original plant is hardly visible behind all the new growth.
I’ve been reading newspapers in little towns around Greater Los Angeles – Downey, Cudahy, Hawthorne – looking for their reaction on the drought. Alot of them are well-aware of their natural surroundings, one man chastising his neighbors in a letter to the editor for trying to have lush green lawns using imported water.
Here at my house, I realized a year or two ago, we needed to start getting rid of water-intensive landscaping – in our case, an acre or so of lawn between our little domicile and our tenants’ up front. So, we just stopped watering huge sections, let it go, and went about trying to find some sort of mitigation for the resulting stickers, dirt and mud.
First we laid a lot of gravel and rock. I like that, it keeps the areas directly around our houses fairly neat and easy to clean. I also like rock collecting, and we go alot of places where we find really great rocks for rock gardens. I got all kinds of cool rocks from all over California.
We also started looking for “drought tolerant” plants. I had this nopal cactus from my mom, I’d dug it out of her front yard when I sold her house, and put it in a plastic pot. There it was for years, toted from one house to another, like a mummy. Sometimes it would grow a nopalito, which would usually shrivel and fall off. Finally I decided to plant the poor old thing. I found out, there were three separate plants in the pot. I can’t get over how well they’re doing now.
I placed my mom’s old strawberry pots among the nopals last year, having had them for years and never used them for strawberries. Wow, they worked fantastic.

I took all the old “mother” plants out of my strawberry pots and replaced them with the babies they’d had, which were growing in the ground all around the pots.
I cleaned them out and added some fresh dirt and started planting the babies. They had been growing on no water in the cold cold ground, and as soon as they got into that peat moss and perlite mix I used, and I gave them a big drink of leaf tea from my rain barrel, they perked up like they’d never been anywhere else. Hello Sweetheart!

Mmmmm! That last storm left me with 55 gallons of leaf tea from my rain gutters. Wow, I got to get more of these barrels.
My husband and I bought a kit to turn these old plastic barrels into rain barrels. We bought the hardware at Home Depot, less than 10 bucks.

We cut a hole in the bottom, no rocket science required, and easy-as-pie, inserted the valve kit. Remember to put it on a raised pedestal so you can get pressure in your hose.
I was amazed, that little storm we had, I got a full 55 gallon barrel. This I will use on my container plants. Right now we’re planting seeds for our Summer garden.
I conserve in times of drought, and try to save some aside in times of plenty – that’s a lifestyle I was raised with. But Cal Water is using the drought to take advantage of us. Don’t be a sap, write to Anthony Rendon, Assemblymember.Rendon@asm.ca.gov Mr. Rendon sits on a committee that is participating in hearings regarding water rates. Cal Water is gouging us, and it’s not only hurting us all personally, it’s going to start hurting our economy. Between this and the upcoming garbage rate increase, we will all have less “disposable” income. That’s going to trickle up when sales taxes continue their steady dive.
Me, I’m going to buy more rain barrels, and keep writing letters. I hope you will do same.
Joe Matz, Recology: Customer rates will TRIPLE under new garbage franchise ordinance – THAT’S A TRASH TAX!
1 FebLately they’ve been having so many meetings, so fast, alot of times, at both ends of the same day, I’ve been questioning whether I should be following all this stuff. It’s just impossible keeping track of all these conversations, so I’ve had to pick out the one that means the most to me right now, and that’s the garbage franchise conversation.
Here it is in a nutshell, given to me by Joe Matz, who runs Chico Recology. Matz complained in the meeting, that he had only been noticed and received the consultant’s report one day previous to the meeting. That’s par for the course in the Nakamura Administration. Matz said the proposal is a demand: the haulers are being told they need to include everything from hazardous waste to Christmas tree pick-up in their bids, and they have to pass the costs along to the ratepayer. And, under this ordinance, all Chico residents will be required to either have trash service, or provide proof of owning a “suitable” vehicle and buy a “trash hauler’s” permit at an as-yet-undisclosed fee. Yep, you will now need a hauler’s permit to take your own trash to the Neal Road Landfill.
And here’s the real whammy – under the city’s demands, Joe Matz expects rates to TRIPLE.
Brian Nakamura doesn’t deny for one minute rates will go up. But he still acts as though the haulers will be paying for it, not the customers. Nakamura is still trying to tell us, he needs the increased fees to fix our streets. No Brian, you’re a liar. You get more than enough money to maintain our streets out of the gas tax, and then there’s the $200,000 annual fee currently paid for a garbage license. None of that money goes into the streets, it is all going hand-0ver-fist into paying the pension obligation – $48 million, just for the city of Chico, and counting. Part of that is Nakamura’s pension, for which he insists on paying only 9% of the cost, we pay 30% and will be paying 50% within the next few years. But under Nakamura’s new contract, that he negotiated with himself, he will pay 9% to received 70 percent of his $212,000+ salary at age 55. But he keeps trying to tell us, he’s going to use the money to fix the streets. I keep waiting for his pants to burst into flames.
Look at the budget folks. The city gets millions of dollars in gas tax, which is supposed to go to fixing our streets. According to a budget report currently posted on the city website, “gas tax is being utilized by the General Fund.” Over $2 million was transferred to the Downtown remodel project. Meanwhile, the streets around my house have potholes that indicate Blight. There are whole neighborhoods where the asphalt is being reduced to gravel. Below, I’ve pasted in the Gax Tax section of the 2012-13 budget. Try to follow it, or go to the city website and read the budgets for yourself.
What’s “pavement management”? Sound like street repair? Only $26,000? And, I ride my bike almost every day, but I’ve never used any of the improved bike trails they’re talking about. I know they spent about $200,000 repaving the bike trail that runs along my neighborhood, and brought guys in on the weekend to paint clever little cyclists right out in the street, as if you would be safe riding there.
And here’s where they steal the money for salaries and benefits Downtown: over a million toward the SR 32 widening – but no work’s progressed, you say? That’s all salaries and benefits. And then there’s “Traffic Safety Improvements, Pedestrian Safety Improvements, Street Improv & Maintenance, Manzanita Corridor Reconstruction – that’s all for salaries and benefits Downtown. Almost none of the money you see on this list was actually spent outside the office.
FUND 307
Actual Actual Recomm
FY10-11 FY11-12 FY2012-13
GAS TAX
GAS TAX FUND
Fund Summary
2013-14 Annual Budget
City of Chico
Revenues
41181 RSTP Exchange 822,856 832,643 827,743 827,743 848,437 848,437
41201 State Gas Tax-Sec 2105 452,645 401,439 426,446 396,690 412,159 412,159
41204 State Gas Tax-Sec 2106 355,744 342,450 290,026 265,354 278,029 278,029
41207 State Gas Tax-Sec 2107 604,536 576,201 612,010 585,808 613,638 613,638
41210 State Gas Tax-Sec 2107.5 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500
41211 State Gas Tax-Sec 2103 835,330 1,186,419 957,683 959,429 1,248,783 1,248,783
44101 Interest on Investments 1,250 (1,651) 0 0 0 0
44519 Reimbursement-Other 0 9,487 0 0 0 0
Total Revenues 3,079,861 3,354,488 3,121,408 3,042,524 3,408,546 3,408,546
Expenditures
Operating Expenditures
Total Operating Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0
Capital Expenditures
12003 East Eighth Street Reconstruction 12,636 0 0 7,364 0 0
12058 Bicycle Path-LCC to 20th St. Park 0 0 0 0 143,750 143,750
13046 Sycamore Creek Bicycle Path I 0 0 0 24,104 0 0
15010 SR 32 Widening 0 1,320,739 0 0 0 0
16011 Traffic Safety Improvements 14,313 45,829 93,409 207,580 100,000 100,000
18906 Annual Pedestrian Improvements 74,468 220,872 0 0 79,325 79,325
18907 Street Improv & Maintenance 52,065 0 100,000 0 0 0
19012 Manzanita Corridor Reconstruction 397,046 5,791 0 32,552 0 0
50057 Pavement Management Program 113 56 20,909 30,551 26,750 26,750
50124 NAP Road Rehabilitation 0 0 0 18,750 1,438 1,438
50126 1st and 2nd Streets Couplet 372,139 251,055 350,000 225,568 408,938 408,938
50166 SR 99 Corridor Bikeway Facility 0 250,266 0 0 138,819 138,819
50208 Nord Highway Bridge Repair 47,236 111,815 0 13,449 0 0
50209 Safe Routes to School 0 0 0 100,000 0 0
50227 Retroreflectivity Signage 0 13,670 77,250 72,110 87,550 87,550
50229 FCC Radio Narrowbanding 0 22,822 0 0 14,109 14,109
Total Capital Expenditures 970,016 2,242,915 641,568 732,028 1,000,679 1,000,679
Total Expenditures 970,016 2,242,915 641,568 732,028 1,000,679 1,000,679
Other Financing Sources/Uses
From:
To:
9001 General (2,500,000) (2,352,500) (2,522,000) (2,522,000) (2,300,000) (2,300,000)
Total Other Sources/Uses (2,500,000) (2,352,500) (2,522,000) (2,522,000) (2,300,000) (2,300,000)
And Other Sources (390,155) (1,240,927) (42,160) (211,504) 107,867
Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues
107,867
Fund Balance, July 1 1,634,719 1,244,564 198,133 3,637 (207,867) (207,867)
Fund Balance, June 30 1,244,564 3,637 155,973 (207,867) (100,000) (100,000)
Fund Name: Fund 307 – Gas Tax
Authority: Streets and Highway Code 2103, 2105, 2106, 2107, 2107.5 and Resolution
Use: Restricted
Major programs, buildings and facilities, major equipment
Description:
Authorized Other Uses:
Authorized Capital Uses:
Operating
Right of way acquisition, maintenance, street sweeping, construction and improvement of street facilities.
The garbage franchise is just Brian Nakamura’s scheme for getting more money out of us, the ratepayers, to pay his salary and benefits.
Right now we actually have a chance to get our legislators to listen to us about water rate increase, WRAM – please write an e-mail to Assemblyman Rendon
30 JanI have joined efforts with Marysville and Oroville for Reasonable Water Rates, along with people from other nearby towns that are being hit with water rate increases, to get the word out to other folks up and down the state – we don’t have to take this TAKING laying down. Cal Water and other private providers will tell you they need the money to serve us! Take one of these right now!
Here, Cal Water is requesting a 38 percent rate increase to cover their “operating costs”. My notice said:
“Cal Water is proposing this change in rates due to the following factors:
- Cal Water is requesting $556,000 to retain the same level of employee health care, pensions, and retiree health care benefits for General Office personnel, the costs of which have increased faster than inflation.
- Cal Water is requesting $423,000 to retain for district personnel the same level of employee benefits described above
- Cal Water is requesting $415,000 for the allocation of General Office operation expenses
- Cal Water is requesting $395,000 to retain quality employees in the district
- Cal Water is requesting $163,000 for water infrastructure improvements between 2013 and 2016
Another problem with our water billing is WRAM – the Water Rate Adjustment Mechanism. This allows Cal Water and other private water companies to manipulate our rates monthly without hearings or CPUC approval. Municipal water companies do not have WRAM. Look at your bills, it’s there.
So, I have been trying to write to papers around the state, telling people what we’re doing – write to Assemblyman Anthony Rendon at Assemblymember.Rendon@asm.ca.gov
This is not a lost effort. Mr. Rendon’s staff has responded to other writers that there will be a hearing regarding water rates and how they affect the ratepayers at the state capital on February 3, 3pm, Room 437. I know that’s short notice, but you can still e-mail Rendon and tell you him you’re concerned about how water rates will affect your life. At least you know it’s something they’re discussing, your comments will have a better chance of having some effect. Be short and to the point, hopefully he will have a lot of e-mails on this subject.
I always feel weird writing to papers in other towns, but what the heck – it’s one of the only ways to network with the more general public. Sure you could look for other groups – that’s called, “preaching to the choir,” Hon. I prefer to launch myself out there, God(dess) save me, and see what I can find. Sometimes I find a closed door, and a long dark walk home. Other times I find somebody – like the other day at the garbage meeting – who says, “Wow, I have been trying to find out how to get in touch with you!” Or, “Hey, that pisses me off too!” Zowie! That really turns my wheels.
I was reading through an online paper in the little town of Downey California, the Downey Patriot. I came across this letter, posted January 23.
Dear Editor:
On early morning walks it’s interesting to observe how we irrigate our property.
Sometimes sprinkler heads are broken and water gushes up like Old Faithful and then cascades into the gutter, or sprinkler heads are directing water onto sidewalks and streets. We, including this writer, waste our precious supply of fresh water big time. We think it’s an infinite supply, that it never will be depleted, that it will always be there for us. Not true. We constantly strive for a beautiful lawn in our semiarid, desert-like environment.
Some scientists at Scripps Institution of Oceanography predict a 50 percent probability that Lake Mead will be completely dry by 2021 because of climate change, unsustainable overuse of the Colorado River and population increase. Lake Mead, a huge reservoir of Colorado River water supplying Arizona, Nevada, California and Northern Mexico is dropping to a level not seen since it was first being filled in the 1930s.
We have been in an 11-year ongoing drought. Many of our large water reservoirs are down 50 percent or more. Look at hills that haven’t burned and notice how brown they are. That is how Southern California would look in its natural state without large amounts of imported water.
We continue sticking our heads in the sand by not immediately taking steps to radically save our diminishing water supply. This writer and his family have spent many happy days on Lake Powell, Mead, Mohave and Lake Havasu boating, swimming, fishing, skiing and camping. It’s amazing to watch the mighty Colorado flow by and know how vital it is for those of us who live in the Western U.S.
It is amazing to see all the water behind these giant dams and now some experts believe that in the future, lack of water may make it necessary to close either Boulder Dam or Glen Canyon Dam.
Byron Dillon
Downey
Zowie! I had to answer Mr. Dillon.
I live in the Northern California town of Chico. I have a group of friends, Chico Taxpayers Association, who have been networking with a growing number of people in Butte, Sutter, Lake and Glenn Counties who are concerned about the way private water companies are billing consumers.
WRAM comes into your bill when your water usage falls below what your private provider determines is necessary to cover their expenses for that month. Over the past year this has added anywhere from $8 to $20 to my monthly bill, while I’ve been replacing plumbing and killing sections of landscaping.
Here in Chico, Cal Water’s “expenses” included over $1.7 million to provide fully-paid pensions and health benefits, cover “general office operation expenses” and new salaries, but only $163,000 for infrastructural maintenance. WRAM allows them to manipulate rates at will, monthly, without any public hearing or CPUC process.
My friends and I are asking legislators to suspend WRAM for full investigation. You can contact me at https://chicotaxpayers.com/ You can also contact Assemblyman Anthony Rendon, Assemblymember.Rendon@asm.ca.gov, who sits on the committee that oversees water issues, and ask him to call for the suspension of WRAM.
I’m hoping the Patriot will run my letter, and that at least some readers will either contact Rendon or come on over to our website and get more information. I work incrementally. Every little contact breeds other little contacts, until an idea gets out there to the general public. I think that’s the way to make a difference, I hope you will join me and give a few minutes of your time to this effort.
Thanks Bob Evans and a WONDERFUL CROWD! for a great conversation – next up, Maureen Kirk, 3rd District Supervisor – February 16, noon to one pm, Chico library
27 JanAgain I was really gratified to get a wonderful crowd for our visit with Butte County District 3 candidate Bob Evans. I was also thrilled to have three other candidates who take the voters seriously – Alan Petersen, candidate for County Assessor, Maureen Kirk, incumbent Dist. 3 supervisor, and Ryan Schohr, who wants to replace termed out Dan Logue in Assembly District 3. It’s essential that we engage the people who want to fill these important positions, not only to find out where they stand on various issues, but to communicate to them the issues we feel are important and where we stand.

Sorry the light is bad here, I’m no photographer. Bob really took charge of the room, he’s a good speaker. There’s Alan Petersen over to the right, thanks for coming in to help out Al!
Evans led off with a quick bio, including his life with the U.S. Air Force, his involvement with Life Touch (at one time of Chico’s biggest employers), retirement, and his subsequent interest in a public service position. After running for and serving a couple of years on Chico City council, it was hard, he said, to just forget about community involvement. He talked about his position on the Alliance for California Business, a group that addresses issues relative to California’s business climate. Evans feels over-regulation is a huge issue for the entire state, keeping businesses from moving to California, and putting undue pressure on already existing businesses. “They are regulating us as if we are L.A,” he says, when our air quality here is no where near as poor or warranting of such measures.
He also talked about the “ag mitigation ordinance” that requires what he feels are onerous mitigation requirements for businesses that want to build new on open land – treating all land as agriculturally viable.
Bob’s a good speaker, he’s comfortable with people and listens well, answering questions directly, even if he had to say, “I don’t know!” He was quick to admit when he didn’t have enough information to have a solid opinion, like on the subject of global warming. But, he reminded us, he’s learning, this was his first speaking engagement, and that he wants to know what people are concerned about.

I can’t say enough how I appreciate people showing up for this speaking tour, including Maureen Kirk, who came early and took good notes. That’s Assembly candidate Ryan Shohr to the left of Maureen in the plaid shirt. This means they care what you think, that’s what it’s all about.
On the subject of the State of Jefferson, Bob said he feels we must have better representation in Northern California. “This is a rural vs urban issue,” he opined, and he’s right, the bigger cities are down South, and get more attention and more tax money than the rest of us. Evans said he feels a serious conversation about “separation” (secession means, from the U.S. entirely) would “get their attention.” And, “if they just laugh at us, we’ll already be down the road [toward legal separation].”
When asked what unique qualification he had for the job, Bob answered that he gets along well with people, and looks for compromise. The next question followed the same line – how does he expect to get along with county staff? He said he’d been meeting with staff, and found they’re really ready to share information. Another person asked him about the general health of the county, and expressed concern about “true unemployment.” Bob said he’s making jobs a priority, but this conversation wandered off – we didn’t get to talk about ways we could bring jobs, or what kind of jobs we’d want. Sorry I did not pursue this, I was so busy trying to take notes, I didn’t think to ask many questions.
Bob did talk about conditions he feels are keeping jobs out of the North State – again, over-regulation, mostly from California Air Resources Board and “environmental groups” that are pursuing what Evans feels are onerous land mitigation laws. At this point he was asked what he thought of the whole global warming issue. He answered with my feelings – who do you trust on this issue? There are two camps, 180 degrees apart, equally more informed than the general public – who do you believe? Evans says he believes in conserving resources, but again mentioned, our air and water here in Northern California are still very good, and we should not be held to the onerous regulations necessary in bigger more industrialized urban areas.
Of course the marijuana discussion came up, a curious audience member wondering what Evans thought of the new ordinance. Citing concern that young people are smoking too much pot these days, Evans praised the pot ordinance and congratulated Maureen Kirk and the Board of Supervisors for a “good job.” He also mentioned he’d been on ride-alongs with the sheriff’s department and seen areas of the county that he felt were being degraded by pot gardens, both environmentally and civilly.
I had to laugh as he talked about the ride-alongs – he described my house right here in Chico! He said he’d seen fences and locked gates, with dogs! Well Bob, I will say here – do not approach my gate. You will see a lock, you will see signs that threaten trespassers with physical humiliation, and you will be greeted by a snarling cur. And then there’s the dogs! I’ll also say, I’m looking for a supervisor that values my property rights. I don’t see any, I’m still looking.
Bob has been all excited about his idea to use Chico Fire Department employees to “patrol troubled areas of town,” meaning, areas where transients are a “problem.” This idea did not go over with our group. One member of the audience described himself as a retired fire chief, retired here from the Bay Area. He tried to offer his knowledge of fire vs police training, saying fire personnel are trained to do physical first aid, but not mental. They are not trained to deal with the mentally ill. Other audience members agreed.
Al Petersen asked a good question – what’s the overall health of the county budget? Here Evans told us what many already know – both the sheriff’s department and the behavioral health department are very undermanned. Then he talked about an issue that I had been trying to figure out how to bring up – when police or sheriff have to arrest a person who is “unsafe to themselves or the public,” including transients, they often have nowhere to take them but Enloe Hospital. I’ve heard this reported in Police Advisory Board meetings, and, when I had a friend who had to be taken to the ER, this is what I’ve seen – especially on weekends, the Enloe ER is turned into a psycho ward. And here’s the hilarious part – these people are dumped by police or sheriff, and then staff has no right to detain them or demand payment of the bill. This is where Enloe gets the figures for much of the loss they write off to the government every year.
The county has a special psychological unit, a trained team, that is supposed to meet law enforcement at the hospital and transport these “patients” to the county mental health facility. But they are undermanned, Bob says. This is what I’ve heard from both representatives of Chico PD and Enloe Hospital. I think this is just unacceptable. I’ve seen the payroll for the behavioral health department – the director is a low-paid ($58,000/year) revolving door position, and the “staff” is made up of interns who get less than $10,000 a year, some of them as little as $1,000. I can’t believe some college kid is qualified to transport a mental patient.
I’ll tell a story here, from the days I lived in Sacramento. I took public transportation all over, and you changed buses Downtown. I would walk up the K Street mall every morning, with a regular herd of bus commuters, to catch the crosstown lines. There I would see regularly a guy dressed in a big white bed sheet, walking calmly along with an insane smile on his blank face. We called him “Jesus,” but his name was Jerry Paddy. He spent his days strolling and occasionally begging up and down K Street, visiting the various parks, the Capitol Rose Garden, Sutter’s Fort, etc. Nobody ever thought a thing of him, some people even regarded him with affection.
One day, a fellow walking over to visit a patient at Sutter Hospital noticed a man and woman struggling in some bushes at Sutter’s Fort. Thinking it was a sexual assault, the man confronted the pair, only to be stabbed right through the gut with a 12 inch knife. The culprit turned out to be Jerry Paddy, who explained he was having consensual sex with the woman, and when he’d been confronted, he admittedly pulled a 12 inch kitchen knife out of the sleeve of his sheet garment, and ran the man through. The man had died on the sidewalk before passersby could even react.
This is what we’re dealing with on the streets of Chico – what, you think mentally competent people sleep in a bundle of dirty rags on the ground? It’s been discussed ad infinitum – we have a problem with mentally ill people wandering our streets. I’ve started to see them wandering my residential neighborhood, thanks to the efforts of “Our Town” to shove them out of Downtown with no regard for the consequences to surrounding neighborhoods. Without proper staffing at the behavioral health department, these people are just riding a Ferris wheel back and forth, being taken to Enloe, then waiting for the cops to leave so they can just wander off and end up in the same pile of slop a week or so later.
I think this is a major issue in Chico. Talk about a job killer. If I was the parent of a new college student, I would not send my kid to Chico. In fact, I’m making plans to send mine out of town right now. The county and the city need to get together on this issue. I don’t want to hear one more report from one more cop who spent a week in a psychology class at Butte College, I want to hear plans to fully fund the behavioral health department and get a real director in there. Look at the salaries for the city of Chico – but the county only offers about $60,000 a year for somebody to run the mental health department? That is literally CRAZY.
Well, the meeting had to come to a close at this point, there was another group waiting at the door. Bob Evans thanked the crowd and left us with this comment: “According to statistics, 14 percent of the electorate is engaged and educated…that includes you!” He promised, “my goal is to see as many groups as I can.”
I had to ask Bob privately for his opinion on Cal Water’s rate hike, and I will give you that in my next installment, I got to take Biscuit for a walk.
Do our “public safety” unions exert inappropriate influence over our city council? See for yourself.
25 JanThanks Michael Jones for all the digging you’ve been doing regarding city election campaign contribution reports. I’ve seen contributions in past that I thought were inappropriate, and I still remember most of a discussion here in town, years back, to limit single contributions. These efforts were undermined by laws that allow Political Action Committees, such as the Chico Police Officers Association, and the International Fire Fighters Association, to donate much more than citizens. In past elections, the CPOA has been the biggest single donor, followed closely by the IFFA, donating or spending thousands to skew our elections in their favor, making sure to promote people who will carry their agenda of higher salaries and fully paid benefits and pension, like Scott Gruendl, Mark Sorensen and Sean Morgan.
Below Michael Jones has sent us a guest commentary regarding his findings. Thanks Michael!
Previous Chico City Councilors felt that receiving political donations in excess of $500 for an election might lead “a contributor [to gain] disproportionate access to or influence” over the City Council. They felt so strongly they banned contributions over $500, and they required that smaller donations to be publicly reported. (Municipal Code 1.30)
Supreme Court decisions disallow limits on independent efforts to elect particular candidates. These independent expenditures cannot be coordinated with the candidate’s campaign. They also must be publicly reported.
An effort by Councilor Dan Nguyen-Tan in 2003 would have required an announcement at the Council meeting when a major contributor had business before the Council. This proposal did not pass. But in the spirit of his concerns, and in harmony with the Municipal Code, we can make those public disclosures.
Chico Police Officers Association (CPOA) has business before the Council this month. That business is the negotiations of the union’s contract with the city. Their contract for fiscal year 2013-14 is for $18,302,883 in wages and benefits, or $143,000 per police employee0.
Previous Councilors put into the Municipal Code that disproportionate influence might be had for over $500 for an election. The Supreme Court said the union (or anyone) could contribute more for the election as long as the candidate did not control it.
CPOA expended $5000.001 for the 2012 election of Sean Morgan.
CPOA expended $2709.212 for the 2006 election of Scott Gruendl.
CPOA expended $2709.213 for the 2006 election of Mark Sorenson.
These Councilors are now in negotiations across the table from CPOA. It is their job to represent the interests of the people of Chico, not the interests of CPOA.
0 2013-14 budget p 149, p 253
1 $500 contribution, $4500 independent expenditure
2 $2709.21 independent expenditure
3 $2709.21 independent expenditure
Note: CPOA in 2008 expended $8000 for television ads for undisclosed purposes
by Michael Jones 1/24/14
Calling all roustabouts – come on down and help me set up chairs for Bob Evans, candidate, Butte County Dist 3
23 JanA reminder that Bob Evans will be our guest this Sunday, Jan. 26, at NOON, at the Chico library. Come on down – the library opens at one o’clock, so you will be right on deck.
I am hoping Bob will talk about the issues facing Butte County, with a special light on District 3, which encompasses a large chunk of Eastern Chico, as well as hill communities Cohasset and Forest Ranch.
Right now, Maureen Kirk is our Dist. 3 supervisor. She will be our guest on CORRECTION Feb 16, also at noon. I have another tentative for March but I haven’t had a hard confirmation on that. I also have a tentative for May. I’ll try to find somebody for April. I have contacted Bill Connelly, who has filed papers to run against Al Petersen for Assessor, and he had promised he’d speak as soon as he filed, but now he’s not getting back to me. I’ll keep poking him in the ass with what a good time we had with Al. He really has some explaining to do, we’ll see if I can nag him in.
I’m hoping to get a good crowd out to reward these people for their time. I want a good conversation, and some answers to our questions about county business. They just spent a lot of time on a highly publicized marijuana ordinance. Meanwhile, they’re transferring water to Southern California subdivisions, while allowing Cal Water to use Chicoans like a herd of cash cows. That’s just the issue that’s on my mind this morning – look at these agendas, meetings that go on all day – there’s some serious business going on in Oroville, and we need to know more about it. There’s also the trash franchise zones and problems in the district attorney’s office. They also do the same kind of “budget adjustments” and “supplemental budget increases” that are done in Chico.
So, read over an agenda or two, watch a meeting, and find yourself a question, or at least be ready to understand the issues. If you are handy with the issues yourself, it’s harder for somebody to feed you a line of horse puckey.
http://www.buttecounty.net/boardofsupervisors/BoardMeetings.aspx


